29 July 2010

Great Letter!

Civilians always victims of war.

You describe the account of civilian casualties caused by Nato forces in Afghanistan as “perhaps the gravest scandal of all” and note that “the record appears to show that an Afghan life is worth far less than that of any Westerner” (leading article, 27 July). In fact, such a revelation is not at all surprising, or even particularly appalling. All military forces prioritise the preservation of their own troops over the lives of inhabitants of what is regarded as enemy territory, whether combatants or civilians.

This attitude is viewed as an essential survival skill. Asuitable historical case in point was the Allied liberation of France from the Nazis in the Second World War, during which up to 70,000 French civilians were unintentionally killed by Allied bombing, committed in the belief that the lives of the Allied troops had to be treated as being of the greatest intrinsic value. So the reason why Western troops have been complaining about the new restrictive rules of engagement as part of a counter-insurgency strategy becomes clear: they perceive it as unfair that the lives of civilians are apparently being seen as of equal or greater importance than their own.

AYMENN JAWAD
CARDIFF


--------------------------------------------------------------

Great letter!

Civilians and women and children are the biggest victims of war - not soldiers!!!

23 July 2010

Blogging As An Art

Blog to go here.

TBC.

The Urban Peasant

I parade myself as an "Urban Peasant".

I think I will expand the concept of an "Urban Peasant" further.

The first stage in this will be making it into a concept at all.

-------------------------

The Feudal System - that lasted roughly a thousand years in Europe - had peasants.

The peasant generally speaking WAS NEVER EVER paid for his ACTUAL WORK PER SE.



-------------------------

Abolishing the concept of unemployment would work wonders for the unemployment statistics.


--------------------------------------

18 July 2010

16 July 2010

Reflections on "Noun+Phobic"

The construction "noun + phobic" supposedly meaning "irrational fear of x,y,z noun" is quite widespread in "psychiatry", psychology, the "social sciences" and political culture and politics too.

It is a dubious construction, borrowed from the dubious pseudo-science of psychiatry for dubious and sometimes questionable motives.

Possibly it's first use was in "hydrophobic" with relation to a strong and irrational - possibly "irresistible" - fear of water - an undoubted psychological symptom of the physical illness of rabies. It seems that this use dates back to about 1759 and that the word also meant "madness".

Now a point to make straight away with regard to political language is that "disliking or disagreeing with something" simply cannot be the same as being scared of it or having a strong (and irrational) fear of it.

For example, if I genuinely don't particularly like the taste of carrots when I eat them and I spit them out, I cannot possibly be "carrotphobic."

And of course an obvious point that follows from this is that therefore anyone can apply this term to someone who opposes them.

For example, if someone is a socialist and there is someone who disagrees with them,then the socialist (whatever that term means) can conceivably call his opponent "socialism-phobic" if he chooses to; and could obviously use this as a tactic rather than say arguing with his opponent.


Kenan Malik has written an article questioning among other things whether there really is such a thing as "islamophobia"..
http://www.kenanmalik.com/essays/prospect_islamophobia.html


Thomas Szasz makes the point (in his brilliant set of esssays "The Medicalisation of Everyday Life" (2007)) that until about 1970 homosexuality or homosexual behaviour was an "illness" - whereas now aversion to homosexuality is - if not an illness - stigmatized, condemned and given a quasi-medical term - "homophobia".


"The Medicalisation of Everyday Life" (2007) is a very important set of essays that deal with
philosophical issues as well as the lie of "mental illness."
The breadth of learning is very wide.
It is a loss and a disgrace that this collection is not more highly regarded and read.



.....

11 July 2010

LIFE BEYOND GROWTH

Current "New Internationalist" questions idea of "economic growth."

Excellent.

www.newint.org

Even what we mean by economic growth - something like "GDP" - is growth in value, not physical or other kind of growth....

TBC

9 July 2010

9th July 2010 - Was Baudrillard onto something?

I watched the EBC 10 O Clock News tonight and the top story - the Moat "shootings" was 1) Not really relevant 2) Not really a story because NOTHING had happened 3) A sort of "PRE-STORY" - a story about a story that MIGHT happen.

The second story was the "SPY" story which is ALSO a bit of an odd "non-story" in a way.

The 3rd story was a real story - 101st UK soldier killed. Still NO MENTION of Afghan casualties. VERY ODD.

The 4th story was about how Spain seems to think it has ALREADY won the World Cup.


One possible question from all this:

Was BAUDRILLARD on to something?
.....

8 July 2010

Views.

No truly serious history of the Jewish people can be written by a committed Zionist.

Nationalism of any kind requires too much belief in what simply is not so.

Paraphrase of - ERIC HOBSBAWM.